Blog

  • I am Zebraman

    Zebraman

    The 17-minute 1986 documentary Heavy Metal Parking Lot records fans waiting for the start of a Judas Priest concert. Amid the myriad of colorful characters partying in the parking lot before the concert, one person stands out from even that motley crew, loudly proclaiming his love of metal music and his vitriolic disdain for punk and pop: Zebraman, so-named in recognition of his zebra-striped unitard. Zebraman’s 50-second tirade is perhaps the highlight of the short film and his character is a favorite among fans of the cult classic.
    (more…)

  • A New Recipe for Gender Roles

    Trevin Wax recently wrote a blog post entitled The Crazy Culture of Complementarianism. He leads off with the pithy observation that “Right beliefs do not always lead to healthy cultures” and then goes on to discuss some of the “crazy” results of complementarianism that he’s noticed, such as the “unexpressed expectation that the godliest women have quiet and introverted personality types, and cannot be assertive and outgoing.”

    I applaud Wax for pointing out some of the problems that have become associated with complementarianism. But he concludes that “It’s the culture of complementarianism that needs to be renewed and restored. Because there’s nothing crazier than taking a beautiful picture of the gospel and making a new law out of it.”
    (more…)

  • Why Homosexuality Isn’t A Sin

    Rothko - Pink, Gold, Red

    We all have an innate sense of right and wrong, of good and evil. We all have moral law written on our hearts. We don’t all have perfect knowledge of that moral truth and we all fall far short of living up to moral standards, but in general we recognize the universal and transcendent nature of morality.

    We know what is sin and what isn’t. We have a deep intuitional realization that murder and rape and theft are wrong. We know that when we hurt another person, whether through words or actions, we’ve done something wrong. We don’t need the Bible to tell us that, we don’t need the church to tell us that — we already know it. This is why the Bible isn’t, and doesn’t need to be, an exhaustive rule book. It’s why the Greatest Commandment resonates so deeply within us — not because it’s something we’ve never heard before, but because it’s something we already knew, whether we realized it or not.
    (more…)

  • Five good things from Mark Driscoll

    Two Driscolls

    Recently I’ve spent a bit of time critiquing some of Mark Driscoll’s viewpoints. And while I continue to find many of his positions highly problematic, I certainly don’t think everything he has to say is bad. So I randomly chose five of his sermons and picked out a paragraph or two from each that I think are pretty darn good.

    I still have a minor quibble here and there with the views expressed in these selections, but in general I think they’re on-target. I have many more issues with the sermons in their entirety, and so in a sense some of these are taken a bit out of context. But the point is that, as much as we may disagree with someone’s style or theology or sense of humor, it’s still worthwhile to look for areas of agreement, to seek greater understanding and to work towards unity.
    (more…)

  • “These enemy dogs who reject the things of God”

    Conquistadors praying before a battle

    Janie B. Cheaney, in her World Magazine post “How to lose an argument” seems to have just discovered that Mark Driscoll is a “lightning rod.” This is a surprise to her because in her mind Driscoll’s focus has always been on spreading the gospel.

    She links to my piece on Driscoll’s dismissal of careful exegesis of controversial texts, labeling it as “rather creative.” Is that doublespeak for “deliberately manipulative”? It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been accused of taking Driscoll’s words out of context, but I have yet to see someone explain exactly how I did so. The most substantive argument against my criticisms has been similar to the one Cheaney employs: that Driscoll is preaching the gospel so we should simply ignore his verbal faux pas.
    (more…)

  • Review: The Great Gatsby

    The Great Gatsby

    The old adage when it comes to art is “show, don’t tell.” The idea is that, by demonstrating rather than dictating, the audience is drawn in as participants instead of being kept at a distance by heavy-handed explication. But this advice can be taken too far: you can tell and show too much, forcing rather than leading, yelling rather than whispering. F. Scott Fitzgerald was a master of showing just enough, but not too much. His prose doesn’t have the austerity of Hemingway’s — by comparison he can be downright florid — but nevertheless, the economy of his lines often reveal more in what they don’t say than in what they do. The Great Gatsby is a short book — most editions run to a mere 160 or so pages — but it’s in between Fitzgerald’s lines that we find the elements of a transcendent tale of love and ambition and tragedy and hope. This why Gatsby is transcendent — not because of the story we have set down before us on the page, but because of the story that we create in our minds. The Great Gatsby moves beyond a simple tale of a lovelorn bootlegger and becomes our story, the American story.
    (more…)

  • Are you planting trees or just cutting them down?

    Oak tree

    Are you planting trees or just cutting them down? 

    Are you making coffee or just drinking it?

    Are you the main character or part of the supporting cast?

    Are you reading sentences but missing the story?

    Are you talking about Jesus instead of showing who Jesus is?

    Are you teaching the “truth” instead of living love?

    Are you looking to the future and ignoring the present?

    Are you waiting for heaven after death and missing heaven during life?

    Are you trying to save people from going to hell when they die instead of trying to save them from the hell they’re experiencing now?

    Are you praying for what you want instead acting how God wants?

  • Review: God’s Gay Agenda by Sandra Turnbull

    God's Gay Agenda

    God’s Gay Agenda by Sandra Turnbull is well-written, thoughtful and hopeful examination of, in the words of the subtitle, “Gays and Lesbians in the Bible, Church and Marriage.” Turnbull’s passion for not only full inclusion of LGBT individuals in the church, but also her view of the crucial role they have to play within the Body of Christ is admirable. Her enthusiasm for the mission of the Church shines through on every page and her deep love of God, her awareness of the Holy Spirit’s work in her life and her respect for the Bible are something the church could use much more of. Turnbull’s optimism for further advancements in God’s kingdom is contagious.
    (more…)

  • Why is this woman so angry?

    Femen

    Warning: every link in this post goes to pages with photos of bare breasts, vulgar language or obscene gestures — sometimes all three. If you’re offended by the naked human body, certain words written on the naked human body and/or certain extended fingers, then don’t click on the links. You’ve been warned!

    FEMEN is a Ukrainian feminist group notorious for their topless protests and confrontational tactics. What are they protesting? A whole slew of social and political issues, including the sex industry, homophobia, the Catholic church, Islam, misogyny, patriarchy and the exploitation and oppression of women. Since its founding in 2008, the group has spread to other countries in Europe, claiming membership well over one hundred thousand women and continues to garner attention for their provocative outcries.

    Recently, a 19-year old Tunisian woman named Amina Tyler posted FEMEN-style protest photos on her Facebook page. As a result, she faces threats of imprisonment and even death. You can read about her story in this New Yorker article.

    This past April, FEMEN protesters in France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Ukraine and elsewhere rallied in support of Amina, staging a “topless jihad.” These protests were documented by The Atlantic in a series of striking photos.

    FEMEN has been widely criticized for employing such a confrontational approach to social protest — they’ve been accused of eschewing constructive dialogue and thoughtful engagement in favor of mere publicity. They’re getting attention, but are they really effecting any change?

    While I don’t agree with everything FEMEN stands for, I’m generally sympathetic to their cause and their message. And while I’m dubious that their tactics will accomplish anything beyond providing photo-ops for a salacious public, I nevertheless think their approach is brilliant. They’ve taken the very characteristics for which they are subjugated and have turned them back on their oppressors. They’ve hijacked objectification and subverted misogyny. They’re not only confronting us with their sexuality, they’re confronting us with their humanity. 

    Is some of it hype? Sure! It is over the top? Of course! But that’s the point. A group of quiet, subservient female protesters standing on a street corner outside a trade fair simply won’t garner the worldwide media attention that a group of screaming topless women rushing pell-mell toward Vladimir Putin did. A handful of women picketing outside a Catholic church won’t make the evening news like a group of angry topless women dousing a priest in water did.

    I don’t think such drastic measures are suited to every cause and situation. But when people are pushed far enough, when they are abused and mistreated and denigrated often enough — not just on an individual level, but as an entire gender — eventually they’ll fight back. And when you’re up against institutions like the Roman Catholic Church, the Russian government or all of Islam, it takes more than just letters to the editor and online petitions to make your voice heard.

    FEMEN forces us to think about how we think about women. Are we more uncomfortable when faced with a screaming, topless woman than with a screaming, topless man? Do images of confident women proudly declaring their opposition to homophobia and misogyny make us pay more attention than men protesting those same issues? 

    FEMEN’s approach might not be comfortable, but how much of that discomfort stems from our unwillingness to truly confront difficult questions? How does our society treat women? How do we view gender roles? And more importantly, how does each of us, as individuals, treat women? How do our own attitudes and actions and words reflect our stereotypes and preconceptions and prejudices? Are we contributing to a world that needs FEMEN to wake us up, or are we contributing to a world where groups like FEMEN will no longer be necessary?

  • Misogyny, Patriarchy and the Church

    Silent Junia

    Elizabeth Esther recently wrote a blog post about “the new misogyny,” highlighting the shift in the church away from blatant misogyny to a more subtle, yet equally toxic attitude towards women. Elizabeth’s post made me simultaneously angry and depressed and disappointed. 

    The anger prompted me to write this post, to vent, to speak out against the status quo. 

    The depression makes me feel like giving up. Because really, what can one person do when the monolithic patriarchy of the institutional church just keeps steamrolling along with megaphone blaring and blinders firmly affixed?
    (more…)