Tag: women

  • The best Christian book of the year

    The best Christian book of the year

    stream

    Several years ago, I attended a church discussion group on the topic of women in ministry. The pastor leading the group spent the first forty-five minutes forcefully laying out the “biblical” case for why women aren’t allowed to be pastors.

    After his diatribe, I asked him, “if women can’t be pastors, does that mean God withholds gifts of preaching and teaching from them? Or does he bless them with such gifts and then denies them their full use?” He equivocated and rehashed his talking points.

    To me, the answers are clear: God doesn’t withhold these gifts from women. There are many women who have been blessed with gifts of preaching and teaching and leadership and who have been called by God to use these gifts to their fullest potential serving the Church. Any church that refuses to acknowledge, accept and celebrate the blessings that God is offering through these women is refusing God himself. Sadly, this rejection and exclusion continues to stymie the Kingdom of God in many churches. (more…)

  • Meting out help for helpmeet

    Meting out help for helpmeet

    helpmeet

    This badly misguided comment crossed my computer monitor yesterday: “GOD made women to be a helpmeet for Man, the Bible says. What is a Help Meet. It is a Proper assistant — A Second in command.” 

    Helpmeet isn’t a real word — or at least it shouldn’t be a real word. It’s essentially a mistake, an etymological misstep that distorts the original text from which it derives. The King James Version of Genesis 2.18 reads: “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” (more…)

  • Putting Words in Paul’s Mouth: “Women: Shut Up!”

    Putting Words in Paul’s Mouth: “Women: Shut Up!”

    shhh

    1 Corinthians 14.34−35 reads:

    Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says. If they want to inquire about something, they should ask their own husbands at home; for it is disgraceful for a woman to speak in the church.

    Here Paul writes in unambiguous terms a dictum applicable not just to a single church, but to “the churches,” repeating his injunction twice: women should remain silent, they aren’t allowed to speak, and then, in case you’re still looking for a way around this rule, he reminds us that “it is disgraceful” for women to speak in church.

    I can’t imagine how Paul could be any more clear. Reading the text at face value, there’s simply no room for interpreting away his command. But despite this clarity, few Christians actually follow Paul’s command. We try to explain it away as a cultural artifact, perhaps addressing a specific situation such as the problems caused by a group of unruly wives in Corinth. An across-the-board prohibition against women speaking in the church? Surely not! (more…)

  • I’m a feminist because

    I’m a feminist because

    Feminism

    I’m a feminist because

    • Women are created in the image of God and have inherent value. They deserve the same opportunities, respect, rights and freedoms that men enjoy.
    • Persistent and pernicious patriarchal oppression permeates virtually every facet of society.
    • Men have been running the show for the thousands of years and have screwed things up for long enough.
    • Our culture has marginalized and suppressed women for so long that, even given the chance, far too few women are truly empowered to take advantage of the opportunities afforded them.
    • The Internet, for all its promise of unfettered expression, is still only a reflection of our societal shortcomings regarding gender issues.
    • Whether in movies or television or music or advertising, women are objectified and sexualized and used to sell and market and promote.
    • Women are recognized more often for their outward appearance rather than their inner beauty.
    • Our culture, even when pretending to defy stereotypes, still reinforces them.
    • Stereotypes are bullshit: I know men that excel at cooking and knitting and are stay-at-home dads and love fashion and paint watercolors. And I know women who fish and hunt and drink beer and burp and work with power tools.

    (more…)

  • A New Recipe for Gender Roles

    A New Recipe for Gender Roles

    Trevin Wax recently wrote a blog post entitled The Crazy Culture of Complementarianism. He leads off with the pithy observation that “Right beliefs do not always lead to healthy cultures” and then goes on to discuss some of the “crazy” results of complementarianism that he’s noticed, such as the “unexpressed expectation that the godliest women have quiet and introverted personality types, and cannot be assertive and outgoing.”

    I applaud Wax for pointing out some of the problems that have become associated with complementarianism. But he concludes that “It’s the culture of complementarianism that needs to be renewed and restored. Because there’s nothing crazier than taking a beautiful picture of the gospel and making a new law out of it.”
    (more…)

  • “These enemy dogs who reject the things of God”

    “These enemy dogs who reject the things of God”

    Conquistadors praying before a battle

    Janie B. Cheaney, in her World Magazine post “How to lose an argument” seems to have just discovered that Mark Driscoll is a “lightning rod.” This is a surprise to her because in her mind Driscoll’s focus has always been on spreading the gospel.

    She links to my piece on Driscoll’s dismissal of careful exegesis of controversial texts, labeling it as “rather creative.” Is that doublespeak for “deliberately manipulative”? It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been accused of taking Driscoll’s words out of context, but I have yet to see someone explain exactly how I did so. The most substantive argument against my criticisms has been similar to the one Cheaney employs: that Driscoll is preaching the gospel so we should simply ignore his verbal faux pas.
    (more…)

  • Why is this woman so angry?

    Why is this woman so angry?

    Femen

    Warning: every link in this post goes to pages with photos of bare breasts, vulgar language or obscene gestures — sometimes all three. If you’re offended by the naked human body, certain words written on the naked human body and/or certain extended fingers, then don’t click on the links. You’ve been warned!

    FEMEN is a Ukrainian feminist group notorious for their topless protests and confrontational tactics. What are they protesting? A whole slew of social and political issues, including the sex industry, homophobia, the Catholic church, Islam, misogyny, patriarchy and the exploitation and oppression of women. Since its founding in 2008, the group has spread to other countries in Europe, claiming membership well over one hundred thousand women and continues to garner attention for their provocative outcries.

    Recently, a 19-year old Tunisian woman named Amina Tyler posted FEMEN-style protest photos on her Facebook page. As a result, she faces threats of imprisonment and even death. You can read about her story in this New Yorker article.

    This past April, FEMEN protesters in France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Ukraine and elsewhere rallied in support of Amina, staging a “topless jihad.” These protests were documented by The Atlantic in a series of striking photos.

    FEMEN has been widely criticized for employing such a confrontational approach to social protest — they’ve been accused of eschewing constructive dialogue and thoughtful engagement in favor of mere publicity. They’re getting attention, but are they really effecting any change?

    While I don’t agree with everything FEMEN stands for, I’m generally sympathetic to their cause and their message. And while I’m dubious that their tactics will accomplish anything beyond providing photo-ops for a salacious public, I nevertheless think their approach is brilliant. They’ve taken the very characteristics for which they are subjugated and have turned them back on their oppressors. They’ve hijacked objectification and subverted misogyny. They’re not only confronting us with their sexuality, they’re confronting us with their humanity. 

    Is some of it hype? Sure! It is over the top? Of course! But that’s the point. A group of quiet, subservient female protesters standing on a street corner outside a trade fair simply won’t garner the worldwide media attention that a group of screaming topless women rushing pell-mell toward Vladimir Putin did. A handful of women picketing outside a Catholic church won’t make the evening news like a group of angry topless women dousing a priest in water did.

    I don’t think such drastic measures are suited to every cause and situation. But when people are pushed far enough, when they are abused and mistreated and denigrated often enough — not just on an individual level, but as an entire gender — eventually they’ll fight back. And when you’re up against institutions like the Roman Catholic Church, the Russian government or all of Islam, it takes more than just letters to the editor and online petitions to make your voice heard.

    FEMEN forces us to think about how we think about women. Are we more uncomfortable when faced with a screaming, topless woman than with a screaming, topless man? Do images of confident women proudly declaring their opposition to homophobia and misogyny make us pay more attention than men protesting those same issues? 

    FEMEN’s approach might not be comfortable, but how much of that discomfort stems from our unwillingness to truly confront difficult questions? How does our society treat women? How do we view gender roles? And more importantly, how does each of us, as individuals, treat women? How do our own attitudes and actions and words reflect our stereotypes and preconceptions and prejudices? Are we contributing to a world that needs FEMEN to wake us up, or are we contributing to a world where groups like FEMEN will no longer be necessary?

  • Misogyny, Patriarchy and the Church

    Misogyny, Patriarchy and the Church

    Silent Junia

    Elizabeth Esther recently wrote a blog post about “the new misogyny,” highlighting the shift in the church away from blatant misogyny to a more subtle, yet equally toxic attitude towards women. Elizabeth’s post made me simultaneously angry and depressed and disappointed. 

    The anger prompted me to write this post, to vent, to speak out against the status quo. 

    The depression makes me feel like giving up. Because really, what can one person do when the monolithic patriarchy of the institutional church just keeps steamrolling along with megaphone blaring and blinders firmly affixed?
    (more…)

  • Steve Chalke is Wrong About Junia (but right about some other things)

    Steve Chalke is Wrong About Junia (but right about some other things)

    Steve Chalke

    Steve Chalke — the so-called “Billy Graham of England” — recently came out in support of same-sex marriage. This is huge news. It is exciting news. It is hopeful news.

    Chalke wrote an article for Christianity magazine espousing his views — you can read the short version of his article here and the longer version here.

    The articles are packed chock full o’ great food for thought. And while I applaud the general conclusion Chalke arrives at, I did find one of his statements to be factually lacking. (more…)

  • Follow-Up: Can you be a Christian and still believe … ?

    Follow-Up: Can you be a Christian and still believe … ?

    Chi RhoMy post Can you be a Christian and still believe … ? caused quite a bit of furor on the interwebs, so I’d like to take a moment to offer a few explanatory notes as well as provide some resources for further exploration of these topics.

    First, the point of the post wasn’t to provide a litmus test for Christian faith (liberal or otherwise). The moment we use any of these issues to judge someone else’s relationship with God, we’ve stepped into dangerous territory — territory that belongs not to us, but to God alone. What you believe about these things doesn’t include you in or exclude you from the Kingdom of God. (more…)