Tag: gender

  • Meting out help for helpmeet

    Meting out help for helpmeet

    helpmeet

    This badly misguided comment crossed my computer monitor yesterday: “GOD made women to be a helpmeet for Man, the Bible says. What is a Help Meet. It is a Proper assistant — A Second in command.” 

    Helpmeet isn’t a real word — or at least it shouldn’t be a real word. It’s essentially a mistake, an etymological misstep that distorts the original text from which it derives. The King James Version of Genesis 2.18 reads: “And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.” (more…)

  • I’m a feminist because

    I’m a feminist because

    Feminism

    I’m a feminist because

    • Women are created in the image of God and have inherent value. They deserve the same opportunities, respect, rights and freedoms that men enjoy.
    • Persistent and pernicious patriarchal oppression permeates virtually every facet of society.
    • Men have been running the show for the thousands of years and have screwed things up for long enough.
    • Our culture has marginalized and suppressed women for so long that, even given the chance, far too few women are truly empowered to take advantage of the opportunities afforded them.
    • The Internet, for all its promise of unfettered expression, is still only a reflection of our societal shortcomings regarding gender issues.
    • Whether in movies or television or music or advertising, women are objectified and sexualized and used to sell and market and promote.
    • Women are recognized more often for their outward appearance rather than their inner beauty.
    • Our culture, even when pretending to defy stereotypes, still reinforces them.
    • Stereotypes are bullshit: I know men that excel at cooking and knitting and are stay-at-home dads and love fashion and paint watercolors. And I know women who fish and hunt and drink beer and burp and work with power tools.

    (more…)

  • A New Recipe for Gender Roles

    A New Recipe for Gender Roles

    Trevin Wax recently wrote a blog post entitled The Crazy Culture of Complementarianism. He leads off with the pithy observation that “Right beliefs do not always lead to healthy cultures” and then goes on to discuss some of the “crazy” results of complementarianism that he’s noticed, such as the “unexpressed expectation that the godliest women have quiet and introverted personality types, and cannot be assertive and outgoing.”

    I applaud Wax for pointing out some of the problems that have become associated with complementarianism. But he concludes that “It’s the culture of complementarianism that needs to be renewed and restored. Because there’s nothing crazier than taking a beautiful picture of the gospel and making a new law out of it.”
    (more…)

  • “These enemy dogs who reject the things of God”

    “These enemy dogs who reject the things of God”

    Conquistadors praying before a battle

    Janie B. Cheaney, in her World Magazine post “How to lose an argument” seems to have just discovered that Mark Driscoll is a “lightning rod.” This is a surprise to her because in her mind Driscoll’s focus has always been on spreading the gospel.

    She links to my piece on Driscoll’s dismissal of careful exegesis of controversial texts, labeling it as “rather creative.” Is that doublespeak for “deliberately manipulative”? It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve been accused of taking Driscoll’s words out of context, but I have yet to see someone explain exactly how I did so. The most substantive argument against my criticisms has been similar to the one Cheaney employs: that Driscoll is preaching the gospel so we should simply ignore his verbal faux pas.
    (more…)

  • Why is this woman so angry?

    Why is this woman so angry?

    Femen

    Warning: every link in this post goes to pages with photos of bare breasts, vulgar language or obscene gestures — sometimes all three. If you’re offended by the naked human body, certain words written on the naked human body and/or certain extended fingers, then don’t click on the links. You’ve been warned!

    FEMEN is a Ukrainian feminist group notorious for their topless protests and confrontational tactics. What are they protesting? A whole slew of social and political issues, including the sex industry, homophobia, the Catholic church, Islam, misogyny, patriarchy and the exploitation and oppression of women. Since its founding in 2008, the group has spread to other countries in Europe, claiming membership well over one hundred thousand women and continues to garner attention for their provocative outcries.

    Recently, a 19-year old Tunisian woman named Amina Tyler posted FEMEN-style protest photos on her Facebook page. As a result, she faces threats of imprisonment and even death. You can read about her story in this New Yorker article.

    This past April, FEMEN protesters in France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Ukraine and elsewhere rallied in support of Amina, staging a “topless jihad.” These protests were documented by The Atlantic in a series of striking photos.

    FEMEN has been widely criticized for employing such a confrontational approach to social protest — they’ve been accused of eschewing constructive dialogue and thoughtful engagement in favor of mere publicity. They’re getting attention, but are they really effecting any change?

    While I don’t agree with everything FEMEN stands for, I’m generally sympathetic to their cause and their message. And while I’m dubious that their tactics will accomplish anything beyond providing photo-ops for a salacious public, I nevertheless think their approach is brilliant. They’ve taken the very characteristics for which they are subjugated and have turned them back on their oppressors. They’ve hijacked objectification and subverted misogyny. They’re not only confronting us with their sexuality, they’re confronting us with their humanity. 

    Is some of it hype? Sure! It is over the top? Of course! But that’s the point. A group of quiet, subservient female protesters standing on a street corner outside a trade fair simply won’t garner the worldwide media attention that a group of screaming topless women rushing pell-mell toward Vladimir Putin did. A handful of women picketing outside a Catholic church won’t make the evening news like a group of angry topless women dousing a priest in water did.

    I don’t think such drastic measures are suited to every cause and situation. But when people are pushed far enough, when they are abused and mistreated and denigrated often enough — not just on an individual level, but as an entire gender — eventually they’ll fight back. And when you’re up against institutions like the Roman Catholic Church, the Russian government or all of Islam, it takes more than just letters to the editor and online petitions to make your voice heard.

    FEMEN forces us to think about how we think about women. Are we more uncomfortable when faced with a screaming, topless woman than with a screaming, topless man? Do images of confident women proudly declaring their opposition to homophobia and misogyny make us pay more attention than men protesting those same issues? 

    FEMEN’s approach might not be comfortable, but how much of that discomfort stems from our unwillingness to truly confront difficult questions? How does our society treat women? How do we view gender roles? And more importantly, how does each of us, as individuals, treat women? How do our own attitudes and actions and words reflect our stereotypes and preconceptions and prejudices? Are we contributing to a world that needs FEMEN to wake us up, or are we contributing to a world where groups like FEMEN will no longer be necessary?

  • Misogyny, Patriarchy and the Church

    Misogyny, Patriarchy and the Church

    Silent Junia

    Elizabeth Esther recently wrote a blog post about “the new misogyny,” highlighting the shift in the church away from blatant misogyny to a more subtle, yet equally toxic attitude towards women. Elizabeth’s post made me simultaneously angry and depressed and disappointed. 

    The anger prompted me to write this post, to vent, to speak out against the status quo. 

    The depression makes me feel like giving up. Because really, what can one person do when the monolithic patriarchy of the institutional church just keeps steamrolling along with megaphone blaring and blinders firmly affixed?
    (more…)

  • Can you be a Christian and still believe … ?

    Can you be a Christian and still believe … ?

    Chi RhoGuess what? You can still be a Christian even if you believe that:

    1. Evolution is true.
    2. The Bible isn’t inerrant.
    3. Women have the same rights as men.
    4. Homosexuality isn’t a sin.
    5. Owning a gun isn’t a God-given right.
    6. America isn’t God’s chosen country.
    7. Republicans aren’t God’s chosen political party.
    8. The modern state of Israel isn’t God’s chosen people.
    9. Decisions about abortion should be left up to individual women.
    10. Non-Christians won’t burn for eternity in hell.

    And you just might be a bit closer to the Kingdom of God if you do believe some of those things.

    Update #1:
    For those of you on Facebook, I’ve created a nice little meme of this post.

    Update #2:
    I’ve provided a list of resources regarding these beliefs in my follow-up post, coincidentally titled: Follow-Up: Can you be a Christian and still believe … ?

  • Junia the Apostle

    Junia the Apostle

    Any discussion of women’s roles in the church must take into account the apostle Junia. Paul writes in Romans 16.7, “Greet Andronicus and Junia, my fellow Jews who have been in prison with me. They are outstanding among the apostles, and they were in Christ before I was” (NIV2011). Though generally accepted as a female apostle throughout church history, Junia has fallen on hard times since the Reformation: her gender has been changed (to the male Junias in the NASB, NIV1984, RSV, UBS4 and NA27) and more recently her apostleship has been questioned. (more…)

  • Review: A Year of Biblical Womanhood by Rachel Held Evans

    Review: A Year of Biblical Womanhood by Rachel Held Evans

    Following closely in the footsteps of A.J. Jacobs’ 2007 book The Year of Living Biblically: One Man’s Humble Quest to Follow the Bible as Literally as Possible, blogger and writer Rachel Held Evans offers her own contribution to the genre of reality-show inspired memoirs in the unimaginatively titled A Year of Biblical Womanhood: How a Liberated Woman Found Herself Sitting on Her Roof, Covering Her Head, and Calling Her Husband “Master.”

    Based upon Evans’ year-long exploration of what it means — and doesn’t mean — to be a “biblical” woman, A Year of Biblical Womanhood provides a powerful polemic against prevailing views of gender roles within the evangelical subculture. (more…)